Scientists monitored volunteers fitted with 15th Century replica armour as they walked and ran on treadmills.
Nothing about the article spells out just who these volunteers were. If they just got some poor schlubs off the street, it's virtually meaningless. I'd like to see this study done with a bunch of pro/oly athletes, given 6 months of "knightly training" and see how they fair. I'm sure heavy armor would impede their ability act at peak performance, but...the modern military wears/carries equipment in excess of what plate armor weighs. Some of those guys never ever get a reprieve during their deployment, literally in combat 24 hours a day. Super elite soldiers are used to being seriously burdened with a lot of gear while still performing at peak capacity for extended periods of time. Knights were supposedly elite, trained from a young age, etc. etc. I think this article is vastly overstated...if metal armors were such a bad idea they wouldn't have been around as long as they were. Say what you want about the military, but innovation is paramount to battle. Military units are always seeking to gain an advantage, and they use what works. Metal armor was extremely effective for a long, long time. Sure, I don't doubt knights were tried after lengthy battles, but I also don't doubt a lot of them could probably fight for days at a time with little rest.