goblinoidgames.com

It makes perfect sense, but it's absolutely not clear from the text!

Either most of the typos and such have been addressed or I'm losing my eye for spotting things. The text is looking pretty damn clean.

I had posted about this at the old forum, so I'm not sure it was ever noticed or fixed, but the pseudo-dragon does not have a paragraph regarding "as a familiar" like the brownie, imp, or quasit.

Professor P wrote:I had posted about this at the old forum, so I'm not sure it was ever noticed or fixed, but the pseudo-dragon does not have a paragraph regarding "as a familiar" like the brownie, imp, or quasit.

Thanks, i thought that was something accounted for but there isn't an explicit description. This will have to be something addressed in a later reprint.

Found a small mistake: on page 43 it says that Cure Light Wounds is a level 1 spell for druids, on page 83 it says it's a level 2 spell. (Which one is correct? I want to know what my new players really are allowed to use. )

Also, speaking of druids, is the level progression table correct for druids? It feels awfully fast, especially since they reach level 9 about when thieves reach level 8.

ibldedibble wrote:Found a small mistake: on page 43 it says that Cure Light Wounds is a level 1 spell for druids, on page 83 it says it's a level 2 spell. (Which one is correct? I want to know what my new players really are allowed to use. )

Also, speaking of druids, is the level progression table correct for druids? It feels awfully fast, especially since they reach level 9 about when thieves reach level 8.

If it goes like in AD&D, it should be 2nd level.

Halfling age for cleric and druids characters is missing (this was also missing in the original DMG). In the Italian translation we used 40+2d6.

I noticed that in the Fighter's class description it states that Fighters get an additional attack per round starting at 15th Level, and then gain on more attack every 5 levels after that for a maximum of 4 attacks per round. However, since Fighters cap at level 20, shouldn't the maximum number of attacks per round be 3? Or do they actually start getting extra attacks at 10th level, for a maximum of 4?

That's how it's written in the Core book, as well as the AEC, so I was wondering if it was intentional. Whatever the case, I'm still confused.

rabindranath72 wrote:If it goes like in AD&D, it should be 2nd level.

Okay, thank you.

Are the latest errata included in the LULU document? I mean, if I buy a print copy of AEC now, is it updated? What about LL? For example the versions on drivethrurpg don't match with the free OLG documents.

Thanks,
Antonio